« September 2008 | Main | November 2008 »

Posted on October 22, 2008 by Jonathan Alper

Availability of Credit Cards After Bankruptcy

A common concern of people considering Chapter 7 bankruptcy is whether they should keep and reaffirm one or more credit cards during bankruptcy. Many Chapter 7 bankruptcy clients believe they need at least one credit card after filing bankruptcy to pay normal  daily expenses, and in some cases, business and travel expenses. I tell most of my clients that they will be able to get  new credit cards immediately after bankruptcy so that they should not reaffirm existing debt just to preserve credit cards for their convenience. Today's New York Times published an article about an individual bankruptcy debtor which confirms credit card availability to bankruptcy debtors. Link: The Debt Trap - Banks Mine Data and Pitch to Troubled Borrowers - NYTimes.com.

Continue reading...

Posted on October 21, 2008 by Jonathan Alper

Attorney Helps Re-establish Credit After Bankruptcy

An Orlando attorney contacted me recently to discuss his law practice that focuses on resolving credit report issues and debt collection matters. I was happy to receive his call because many of my bankruptcy clients ask me for assistance dealing with collection agencies and repairing their credit score after they file bankruptcy. The attorney’s name is Walter Benenati, and he deals primarily in Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) litigation.

Continue reading...

Posted on October 15, 2008 by Jonathan Alper

Are Investments Financed With Consumer Credit Cards Non-Consumer Debt For Means Test Qualification?

We are preparing a bankruptcy for a client whose household income is over $100,000 per year. He does not even come close to passing the means test. The client states that most of credit card debt is for cash advances which were invested in the stock market. He also took a second mortgage on the house and invested most of the money in the stock market. The recent stock market crash is causing him to default on the credit cards. The client insists that his credit card advances invested in the market constitutes "non consumer debt" and because most of his overall debt is "non-consumer" debt he is exempt from the means test.

Continue reading...

Hiring Debt-Relief Company To Negotiate With Credit Cards

Many prospective bankruptcy clients ask me during their initial consultation whether they should use a company to help them negotiate settlements with credit card companies prior to pursuing Chapter 7 bankruptcy. My experience is that credit negotiation companies can help people with a small number of credit cards, but they usually are unable to successfully settle with several different creditors. The bigger problem is that a significant percentage of credit negotiation companies are scams; they charge already overwhelmed consumers up-front fees and then do very little to solve the consumers debt problems. The Wall Street Journal on October 14 had an article on "debt relief firms. " The article conveys the story of a Florida consumer who hired a debt-relief company which never settled any of his debts. The consumer eventually had to file bankruptcy and says that "I wish I had done that to begin with." If you are considering hiring a company to settle your credit card debts, you should first read the Wall Street Journal Article.

The web address of the Article is : http://sec.online.wsj.com/article/SB122394458494631223.html

Posted on October 09, 2008 by Jonathan Alper

Debtor's Decision To Surrender Car Was A $1,000 Mistake

A bankruptcy client owned a car with a small car loan. The client had thousands of dollars of equity in a car and stated on his bankruptcy petition that he wanted to reaffirm the loan and keep the car. I explained to the client that he would have to pay the bankruptcy trustee the amount of non-exempt car equity. This client's car exemption was $1,000 and the car equity was at least $5,000. After filing bankruptcy the client decided that he could not afford to both pay the trustee and pay future car payments because his salary had been decreased after filing. So, he called the car lender and surrendered the vehicle. The lender sold the car at auction for the loan value.

Continue reading...

Watch What You Say When You Meet The Bankruptcy Trustee

I tell my bankruptcy clients that when they meet the Chapter 7 Trustee they should answer his questions truthfully and simply, but that they should not volunteer information which is not responsive to questions. Last week, one of my clients was progressing through an uneventful meeting with her Chapter 7 Trustee. The Trustee asked whether the client expected an income tax refund for 2008, and the client said she did not. The Trustee was then about to close the meeting when the client blurted out a question, "What do you want me to do with my IRS stimulus check?" The Trustee then explained that the client would have to turnover the $1,600 check to the bankruptcy estate.

Continue reading...

Posted on October 07, 2008 by Jonathan Alper

Company Recommended To Help With Mortgage Workouts

People facing foreclosure occasionally asks me whether they should hire an attorney or a nonlegal company to help them negotiate mortgage modification. I explain that most attorneys, including myself, do not do that type of work and that negotiating a mortgage settlement is primarily not a legal matter. I also tell them that most clients report that hiring a private company to assist with mortgage workouts is not worth the money charged; most firms charge a significant fee up front. For the first time last week I spoke with bankruptcy clients who have a very favorable experience working with a company that assisted them with a mortgage workout.

Continue reading...

Posted on October 05, 2008 by Jonathan Alper

Mortgage Foreclosure Mitigation in Final Rescue Bill

I have previously posted on this Blog information about  homeowner mortgage benefits in the initial bailout bill that was rejected by the House on September 29, 2008. I have reviewed the final, revised bill signed into law on October 3, 2008. The final bill contains essentially the same mortgage modification provisions. The bill directs the Treasury to encourage mortgage service companies to mitigate foreclosure by adjusting the interest rate, payment terms, as well as the mortgage balance of certain home mortgages. The law is written generally and without details. The Treasury Department likely will issue federal regulations which state whom is entitled to benefits and the procedures to request mortgage modification.